Somewhere Jimmy Chitwood Is Smiling...

  • Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:25 PM
  • Written By: Josh Bycel

Share:

... because there is one story that is not being talked about in the NCAA tournament. Maybe it’s just too explosive. Maybe the media are trying to bury it. Maybe ... America is not ready to deal with it. But the simple truth is, the breakout stars of this year's tourney are .. white guys!

They are everywhere. And, yes, they still might not be able to jump but they can pass, rebound, play defense and hit big-time, pressure-packed shots to win huge games. The NCAA tournament is starting to look like a NASCAR race or a lunchtime pick-up game at the local YMCA. Call it “The Revenge of Billy Hoyle” or the “Jimmy Chitwood 2: The Heretic”. But the dudes from Northern Iowa, Butler, Purdue, Duke, Ohio State, St. Mary’s and Cornell are kinda kicking serious ass.

Now, this is not a race thing. And I’m really not trying to make any profound statement ... this is just a blog after all. I guess I’m just pointing out this statistical anomaly, this once-in-a-lifetime moment ... like when “Entourage” is actually funny or when “Lost” actually makes sense.

Take Ali Farokhmanesh from Northern Iowa. He won the first-round game against UNLV with three-point dagger. And then, to top that, he cemented the monumental upset over Kansas with a cold-blooded pull-up three. He did all of this without letting that unfortunate “Midwest Frat Dude: I usually wear a hat backwards so who cares” haircut he rocks trip him up.

Then there is Mickey McConnell from St. Mary’s ... who banked in a three to put Villanova out of its misery. First, the name: Mickey McConnell. Could he have a whiter name? Maybe Whitey McWhitington. And he looks like he’s about 13 years old. But the guy can play. Plus, the whole St. Mary’s team is filled with dudes from Australia. Like we didn’t have enough good white guys here, so they had to import some.

Cornell literally has 78 skinny, 6-5 guys on its roster. When they sub into games, it’s like attending a Young Republican college mixer or watching a scene with David Spade from “P.C.U.” And I think they look whiter because in all the times I have been to Ithaca I have NEVER seen the sun. I don’t think it exists.

We could go on and on. And it’s not just the mid-majors. Chris Kramer carried Purdue into the Sweet Sixteen, and Jon Scheyer and Kyle Singler have led Duke in almost every category, including the “grimace/fist pump” after they get a call.

Okay, so this whole theory might be a little thin but we “white guys” don’t have much to hang our hat on besides “bunting the runner over” and “making a great crack back block” so I’m running with this ... and it got me thinking about the best white players in the recent history of the tournament. I’m talking the last 20 years.

Here is my top five:
5. Bryce Drew. Valparaiso. Beat Ole Miss with an amazing shot in 1998.
4. Wally Szczerbiak. Carried Miami of Ohio to the Sweet Sixteen in 1999.
3. Gerry McNamara. Syracuse. Scored 43 against BYU in 2004.
NOTE: these top two kill me because I hate their school but ...
2. Bobby Hurley. Duke. 19-2 record. Averaged 12 points, 2 steals and 7 assists in the NCAA tournament.
1. Christian Laettner. Duke. Enough said ...



What does everyone else think? By the way, can’t wait for a Northern Iowa, Cornell, Butler and St. Mary’s Final Four.





8 Takes
Submit
Takes

username
Ted from NY
Well, it all makes sense. The Final 4 is in Indy this year. The "Hoosiers" state. The place where they drink milk after auto races. Perhaps the whitest city in America??
username
SamIAm
Hilarious stuff, SB2EB!!!
username
TheRealJimmyChitwood
Go back 25 years so you can include Steve Alford.
username
Dave
The Experts forgot to tell Butler they were going to lose to Syracuse
username
Killer
Steve Nash leading Santa Clara over Arizona as a freshman in a 15/2 upset.
username
nic from indy
it does snow a lot here to make it white. then we all shovel are drives to play basketball and i perfer cokes.
username
Realist
They're winning because as is usual with Caucasians....they're playing SMART, STRATEGIC, EFFECTIVE basketball. And as usual, those of the darker persuasion get too caught up in trying to be fast and showy without any regard for efficacy; they're dense. Think about turnovers; throwing the ball at a player even though 1) he's being well defended, 2) you're running too fast for the play to work well, 3) passing the ball would be asking for a turnover or wasted possession. I think these coaches see these athletic guys and feel comfortable ignoring smart, reasonably-paced, strategy strong basketball. The same dynamic plays out in non-sports situations; brains conquer brawn when brawn is supposedly superior. With that said, white people can only dream of being on par with blacks physically. Too stiff, slow, and generally weak.
username
R2
It's also easier for a white person to be a break out star than it is a black person; black basketball players already have somewhat of an edge with their likely superior footwork, body control, speed, and general atheleticism; the expectations are there, they're higher, and the competition is tough. White breakout stars breakout by doing exceptionally well the things white players (and black players too) generally don't manage; competition isn't as tough for them to get notice.