L.A. Is Pierreville No More

  • Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:09 PM
  • Written By: Dodgers Diaries

Share:

Au Revoir, Juan Pierre.

A year ago, I might have said good riddance (save for the fact that I don’t know how to say that in French). But after the 2009 that Pierre put up, I’m a bit more melancholy about his departure.

Sure, Pierre had no arm. Sure, he couldn’t hit for power. Sure, he failed to ignite the offense because he didn’t get on base enough. Sure, his blind devotion to his consecutive games streak stood in the way of the development of Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier, the two cornerstones of the 2010 Dodger offense.

But in 2009, he stopped pouting about playing time, largely because he got some. It took Manny Ramirez’s 50-game suspension for using banned substances to get Pierre in the lineup on an everyday basis, but given the chance, he performed admirably. Pierre put up Dodger career highs in average, on-base percentage, slugging and OPS. I criticized him for his poor .655 OPS in 2008; in

2009, he raised it by 100 points. A .757 OPS still isn’t terrific, but for a fourth outfielder, it’s not awful.

With the White Sox, Pierre will have an opportunity to start every day -- at least until Chicago realizes he’s not much better than the parade of losers they’ve thrown out there: Scott Podsednik, Brian Anderson and Dewayne Wise (although he gets a pass for saving Mark Buehrle’s perfecto).

The Dodgers will get two players to be named later, thus debunking the myth that the PTBNL is always the same person. But this deal wasn’t about equal value. It was addition by subtraction. The Dodgers will eat about half of the remaining $18 million on Pierre’s contract, giving them about $4.5 million per year to spend on another player.

With Xavier Paul, Jason Repko or any number of minor leaguers ready to step in as the fourth outfielder in 2010, I suspect the Dodgers will use this money to upgrade the pitching staff. No, they won’t be signing any John Lackeys or Roy Halladays. They’ll look for bargains like they did with Randy Wolf last year. Like last year, they’ll wait until the scraps are left behind the Yankees, Phillies and Red Sox. Then they’ll sign a parade of horribles like Jeff Weaver, Eric Milton, Claudio Vargas, et al.

Ned Colletti has maintained that despite Frank and Jamie McCourt’s marital difficulties, the team will be business as usual. Sadly, that’s true.

So long, Juan Pierre. If you hadn’t been so grossly overpaid, we might have loved you here in Los Angeles. At $4.5 million a year, you’re a decent option for Chicago. Maybe they’ll love you there.

-- JOHN ROSENTHAL





3 Takes
Submit
Takes

username
bradmachado@aol.com
He kept the Dodgers afloat while Manny was getting his balls back. This is the thanks he gets. You talk overpaid? Schmidt, Billingsley, Martin, Burger King, and the list goes on.
username
Craig Nilsen
i watched him as one of the main cogs here for the 03 Marlins and he didn't exactly stink up Dodger Stadium. I think it was a bad move.
username
Dodgerblue
Players don't have to justify their salaries--ownership does. A player's only obligation is to give 100% on the field and I don't think there's any question that Pierre did. As far as pouting or complaining about playing time: If I've got someone sitting on the bench who isn't disatisfied with playing time, he should probably start thinking about giving up baseball and getting a job selling shoes. I think the Dodgers did a poor job of using Juan Pierre. Sure, he doesn't have an arm, but he offers certain things offensively that the Dodgers were unable to replace down the stretch, once Manny came back. There would have been no redemption at all for the way they used him and the money they paid if Manny hadn't gotten busted. Pierre did one hell of a job filling in. For Juan's sake, I am glad they traded him, because he never would have gotten a fair shake in LA and deserves to play full time somehwere.